Friday, June 15, 2012

In Camera Meeting Disclosure

Former Mayor Gary Korpan 
Offers His Opinion Of In Camera Meetings

Once there are no longer any legitimate/real reasons for an item to be in camera (e.g., ongoing legal or labour negotiations, property purchase or sales, intergovernmental negotiations, or privacy restrictions) then the matter should be disclosed.

The public is paying for it all and deserves to know the facts. The failure to fully disclose the now long past "pay the city administrator not to work" scandal (aka Berry affair) is a classic example of outrageous behaviour falsely hidden by misuse of in camera rules by people who have clearly forgotten who elected them and who they should be accountable to.

Full disclosure now.

Gary Korpan Nanaimo


No comments:

Post a Comment

Your comment will appear after moderation before publishing,

Thank you for your comments.Any comment that could be considered slanderous or includes unacceptable language will be removed.

Thank you for participating and making your opinions known.